Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's battle over $500M winery

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's battle over $500M winery
Published 4 weeks ago on Apr 26, 2024

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Legal Battle over $500M Winery Intensifies Amid NDA Dispute.

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Legal Battle over $500M Winery Intensifies Amid NDA Dispute

In the ongoing saga of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's legal dispute over their $500 million winery, tensions have escalated as Pitt's recent motion to obtain Jolie's past Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) has been met with strong opposition from Jolie's legal team.

Court documents obtained by Page Six reveal that Jolie's lawyers have labeled Pitt's request for access to her NDAs as "expensive," "wasteful," "unreasonable," and even "abusive." The crux of Jolie's argument lies in her claim that Pitt's insistence on a comprehensive NDA during their failed Miraval deal was an attempt to silence her regarding allegations of abuse against him and their family.

Jolie, 48, alleges that Pitt, 60, subjected her and their children to physical abuse, particularly highlighting an incident during a flight from France to California in 2016. This flight, according to Jolie, marked a significant escalation in Pitt's abusive behavior, prompting her to leave him immediately afterward.

Central to the dispute is Pitt's demand for Jolie to disclose all her past NDAs with third parties, a move that Jolie's legal team deems invasive of her privacy and potentially harmful to the rights of other parties involved. The documents argue that such a request would not only divulge confidential information but also violate the privacy rights of those associated with the agreements.

Moreover, Jolie's side contends that Pitt's focus on her past NDAs is irrelevant to the case at hand and serves as a distraction from the core issues concerning the Miraval deal. They assert that Pitt's attempt to correlate Jolie's previous NDAs with his own request for an NDA covering allegations of abuse is both misguided and indicative of his abusive conduct.

The legal battle over the winery, purchased by the former couple in 2008, has been ongoing since Jolie filed for divorce in 2016. With proceedings unfolding in courts across California and Luxembourg, the dispute has become emblematic of the complexities surrounding high-profile divorces in Hollywood.

Paul Murphy, an attorney representing Angelina Jolie, condemned Pitt's attempt to equate standard NDAs with his alleged history of abuse, labeling it as "shameful." Murphy emphasized that the case transcends mere contractual disputes and underscores broader issues of power and privilege.

Notably, Jolie's legal filings underscore the emotional toll of the legal battle, painting a picture of a family torn apart by personal and professional conflicts. Despite efforts to maintain joint custody of their six children, including Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Vivienne and Knox, Jolie and Pitt find themselves embroiled in a bitter struggle over the future of their shared assets.

While representatives for Pitt declined to comment on the recent developments, a source close to the actor characterized the dispute as a "basic business dispute" that has been needlessly complicated by Jolie's personal grievances.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the public remains captivated by the unfolding drama between two of Hollywood's most iconic figures. With a hearing scheduled for May 16, the outcome of the dispute over the winery is yet to be determined, leaving both parties and their supporters on edge as they await the next chapter in this tumultuous saga.


  • Written news comments are in no way https://www.showbizglow.com it does not reflect the opinions and thoughts of. Comments are binding on the person who wrote them.