Lauryn Goodman Criticized for Financial Demands on Kyle Walker

Lauryn Goodman Criticized for Financial Demands on Kyle Walker
Published 4 months ago on Jul 30, 2024

Lauryn Goodman Criticized by Judge in Case Against Kyle Walker Over Childcare Demands.

Lauryn Goodman Criticized by Judge in Case Against Kyle Walker Over Childcare Demands

In a dramatic courtroom decision, Instagram influencer Lauryn Goodman was reprimanded by a judge for her financial demands on England footballer Kyle Walker, following their affair that resulted in the birth of their daughter, Kinara Storm. Goodman, who was in a brief relationship with Walker, sought significant financial support, which the court found excessive and unwarranted.

Background and Court Case

Lauryn Goodman and Kyle Walker, a prominent England and Manchester City player, had a brief affair resulting in the birth of their daughter, Kinara Storm. Walker, already married to Annie Kilner and father to three other children, faced a challenging situation as he attempted to keep the affair and child a secret. However, Goodman used the situation to her advantage, demanding extensive financial support.

The court case focused on Goodman's claims for child maintenance and additional expenses, which she argued were necessary for raising their daughter. The case gained widespread attention due to the significant sums involved and the public profiles of both parties.

Judge's Critique of Lauryn Goodman

Judge Edward Hess delivered a scathing 30-page ruling, criticizing Goodman for her behavior and financial demands. He accused her of using Walker as an "open-ended cheque book" and leveraging the secret of their child's paternity to extract money from him. The judge found Goodman to be an "unreliable" witness who tailored her evidence to suit her case rather than the truth.

Among Goodman's demands were £33,000 for air conditioning for her seven-bedroom mansion in Hove, Sussex, £22,000 for furnishings, £70,000 for a Mercedes GLE to be replaced every three years, and £30,000 for a car allowance for a nanny. She also requested £14,750 per month in child maintenance, £3,900 per month for childcare costs, and funds for a bespoke baby gate and an iron.

The judge noted that Walker had already spent significant amounts on Goodman and their child, including £48,000 for fitted wardrobes and a media screen, £75,000 for a furnishing fund, and £52,164 for curtains and a blind. Despite this, Goodman continued to demand more, leading the judge to describe her as someone who spent money "like it was going out of fashion."

Judge's Praise for Kyle Walker

In contrast to his critique of Goodman, Judge Hess praised Walker for his "grace, generosity, and kindness." He acknowledged that Walker had acted with dignity and honesty, especially after the secret of his paternity became public. Walker's exclusive interview with The Sun, where he openly discussed the situation, was also noted as being to his credit.

The judge emphasized that Walker's actions, including his financial support for Goodman and their child, were in line with his responsibilities. He criticized Goodman for attempting to portray herself as a victim, noting that she had actively instigated media coverage of the situation and used it to her advantage.

Financial Demands and Court's Decision

Goodman's financial demands were largely dismissed by the court. The judge found many of her claims to be exaggerated or unnecessary. For example, her request for £33,000 for air conditioning was deemed excessive, with the judge suggesting that modestly-priced fans would suffice. Additionally, her request for a trust fund for their children's nursery and school fees was denied, as the judge expressed doubts about her ability to manage the funds responsibly.

Walker, who earns £150,000 per week, had previously increased Goodman's housing budget from £1.85 million to £2.4 million after she threatened to move near his Cheshire home. The court found that Goodman had no intention of keeping the matter private, as she had suggested, and that she had leveraged the situation for financial gain.

Following the court's decision, Walker spoke out against Goodman's "insatiable greed and relentless pursuit of money." A spokeswoman for Walker emphasized that he had always been fair and generous, and that the proceedings were unnecessary. She criticized Goodman for orchestrating a media campaign that intruded on the private lives of Walker, his wife Annie, and their family.

Goodman, however, maintained that she was a "dedicated single mother" and expressed her intention to provide for her children. She thanked her legal team and the judge for securing her children's future and vowed to focus on building a solid foundation for them.

The case highlights the complexities and challenges of high-profile relationships and the legal disputes that can arise from them. It also underscores the importance of responsible financial planning and the ethical considerations involved in publicizing private matters for personal gain. The ruling serves as a reminder that the courts can and will take a firm stance against individuals who seek to exploit their circumstances for financial benefit.

Comments

  • Written news comments are in no way https://www.showbizglow.com it does not reflect the opinions and thoughts of. Comments are binding on the person who wrote them.