Celebrities
GMB star slammed for cruelly suggesting Princess Kate’s a SMOKER
Good Morning Britain Star Faces Backlash for Remarks on Princess Kate's Appearance Post-Cancer Treatment.
Background and Setting
In a display of resilience and duty, the Princess of Wales, 42, took to the balcony overlooking the Cenotaph in central London for Remembrance Sunday, just months after concluding her chemotherapy treatment. This marked her second appearance at a Remembrance event over the weekend, symbolizing her gradual return to public duties. Princess Kate stood with Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, in the absence of Queen Camilla, who was reportedly unwell. However, her poignant appearance soon became the target of a contentious remark that spurred a wave of online backlash.
Controversial Tweet by Narinder Kaur
The issue arose after Narinder Kaur, a former Big Brother contestant and commentator on shows like Good Morning Britain, took to social media to comment on the Princess’s appearance. In her tweet, the 51-year-old wrote: “Genuine question—why has Kate aged so much? Isn’t she only 42? Is she a smoker? It’s the only explanation.” Her comment was swiftly condemned, with critics labeling her words as “dreadful” and “disgusting,” especially given the Princess’s recent health battles.
The criticism on X (formerly Twitter) was swift and severe, as users accused Kaur of insensitivity, not only towards Princess Kate but also towards those battling serious illnesses, especially cancer. Facing the wave of backlash, Kaur deleted her initial tweet and issued a statement acknowledging her mistake.
Apology and Clarification
After deleting the post, Kaur shared an apology, acknowledging that her remark was “stupid” and “insensitive.” She later elaborated on her sentiments in a video, addressing the uproar her comments had caused. “I put out a stupid tweet,” she said in the video, explaining that her intention was not to be “malicious or nasty.” She emphasized that the comment was an “innocent ask,” though in retrospect, she realized it had been both thoughtless and harmful. Kaur pointed out that her questioning Kate’s appearance was uninformed and inconsiderate, given her own personal experience with cancer in her family—her brother had undergone rigorous chemotherapy treatments.
In her video, Kaur highlighted that her remarks had sparked intense and, at times, offensive responses. She asserted that, while she accepted criticism, the abuse she received was disproportionate and, in her view, largely fueled by racial and political biases. She expressed frustration at the double standard she perceived, arguing that other users who had commented on the Princess’s appearance did not face the same vitriolic response.
Defending Herself Against Criticism
Kaur went on to address the nature of the responses she had received. She alleged that some of the criticism came from accounts with Union Jack and EDL (English Defence League) symbols, which she interpreted as indicative of racial prejudice. Kaur maintained that her identity as a “brown woman” had fueled the intensity of the backlash, and she expressed her determination to not be “silenced” by what she deemed as racially charged criticism.
In her statement, Kaur touched upon her views on privilege, implying that the Princess of Wales, given her social status, may not face the same struggles as the average person undergoing cancer treatment. Her comments on this issue added another layer to the debate, sparking further division among those who supported her sentiment and those who saw it as a misplaced assumption.
Latest News
Good Morning Britain Star Faces Backlash for Remarks on Princess Kate's Appearance Post-Cancer Treatment.
Background and Setting
In a display of resilience and duty, the Princess of Wales, 42, took to the balcony overlooking the Cenotaph in central London for Remembrance Sunday, just months after concluding her chemotherapy treatment. This marked her second appearance at a Remembrance event over the weekend, symbolizing her gradual return to public duties. Princess Kate stood with Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, in the absence of Queen Camilla, who was reportedly unwell. However, her poignant appearance soon became the target of a contentious remark that spurred a wave of online backlash.
Controversial Tweet by Narinder Kaur
The issue arose after Narinder Kaur, a former Big Brother contestant and commentator on shows like Good Morning Britain, took to social media to comment on the Princess’s appearance. In her tweet, the 51-year-old wrote: “Genuine question—why has Kate aged so much? Isn’t she only 42? Is she a smoker? It’s the only explanation.” Her comment was swiftly condemned, with critics labeling her words as “dreadful” and “disgusting,” especially given the Princess’s recent health battles.
The criticism on X (formerly Twitter) was swift and severe, as users accused Kaur of insensitivity, not only towards Princess Kate but also towards those battling serious illnesses, especially cancer. Facing the wave of backlash, Kaur deleted her initial tweet and issued a statement acknowledging her mistake.
Apology and Clarification
After deleting the post, Kaur shared an apology, acknowledging that her remark was “stupid” and “insensitive.” She later elaborated on her sentiments in a video, addressing the uproar her comments had caused. “I put out a stupid tweet,” she said in the video, explaining that her intention was not to be “malicious or nasty.” She emphasized that the comment was an “innocent ask,” though in retrospect, she realized it had been both thoughtless and harmful. Kaur pointed out that her questioning Kate’s appearance was uninformed and inconsiderate, given her own personal experience with cancer in her family—her brother had undergone rigorous chemotherapy treatments.
In her video, Kaur highlighted that her remarks had sparked intense and, at times, offensive responses. She asserted that, while she accepted criticism, the abuse she received was disproportionate and, in her view, largely fueled by racial and political biases. She expressed frustration at the double standard she perceived, arguing that other users who had commented on the Princess’s appearance did not face the same vitriolic response.
Defending Herself Against Criticism
Kaur went on to address the nature of the responses she had received. She alleged that some of the criticism came from accounts with Union Jack and EDL (English Defence League) symbols, which she interpreted as indicative of racial prejudice. Kaur maintained that her identity as a “brown woman” had fueled the intensity of the backlash, and she expressed her determination to not be “silenced” by what she deemed as racially charged criticism.
In her statement, Kaur touched upon her views on privilege, implying that the Princess of Wales, given her social status, may not face the same struggles as the average person undergoing cancer treatment. Her comments on this issue added another layer to the debate, sparking further division among those who supported her sentiment and those who saw it as a misplaced assumption.
Last News
Arabella Chi Flaunts Baby Bump in Ibiza Before Due Date
Kate Ferdinand Flaunts Tiny Waist in Dubai Holiday Snaps
Christina Haack Opens Up About Anxious Attachment & Healing
Zara McDermott and Louis Tomlinson Share First Public Kiss
Daisy Edgar-Jones Dazzles in 3 Chic Looks in NYC
Jennifer Lopez looks ageless in a towel in no-makeup video
Amanda Holden spanks her derriere and thanks Spanx
Amanda Holden shows off more than bargained as she dances around in her outfit of the day
Meet Harley Cameron, the stunning model who went from a BKFC ring girl to become a pro wrestler and found love
GreenGirlBella, Rocks Emirates Stadium in Painted Home Kit
Amanda Holden calls herself a 'good girl' in white dress with 'cheeky' split
Mum slammed by parents after flashing thong in school run outfit
Lottie Moss makes jaws dropp as she shows off her flawless body
Amanda Holden wears nothing beneath plunging white dress
Comments
Written news comments are in no way https://www.showbizglow.com it does not reflect the opinions and thoughts of. Comments are binding on the person who wrote them.